Post by merkavah12 on Mar 3, 2011 21:42:57 GMT
www.amazon.com/History-Fiction-Science-Chronology-No/dp/2913621058
From the blurb:
Now has anyone actually read this...thing?
From the blurb:
History: Fiction or Science?` is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written.
This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data.
The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.
You will be amazed to discover: - That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; - That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; - That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; - That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; - That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; - That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; - That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; - That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims.
Henry Ford once said: "History is more or less bunk". Leading Mathematician Anatoly Fomenko proved it.
This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data.
The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays.
You will be amazed to discover: - That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; - That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; - That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; - That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; - That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; - That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; - That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; - That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims.
Henry Ford once said: "History is more or less bunk". Leading Mathematician Anatoly Fomenko proved it.
Now has anyone actually read this...thing?